WB 5.0 - don't do it!
Seriously annoyed
Friday, November 4, 2005 by tarinuk | Discussion: New Releases
But why is it that when a module is updated I get problems? Last time it was Cursor XP, this time it's WB 5.0.
I installed it (from Stardock Central), restarted my machine, filled in my user data and pow... nothing.
The 'upgrade' couldn't make a signature... then it decided I had used up my installs (amazing given I only upgrade when I'm prompted to and have only 3 machines - 2 of which are using last year's products).
I'm pretty annoyed about this because it seems to be a repetitive issue and one that doesn't get enough attantion. Don't go down the MS route and use your PAYING customers as guinea pigs: SORT THE SOFTWARE AND THE REGISTRATION, then prompt us to update.
Oh and after uninstalling WB 5 (and rebooting AGAIN) there was no WB4.0, so I had to reinstall that too.
Can I bill you for the hour you've just wasted of my time?
No course not.
Bloody annoyed here.
Reply #2 Friday, November 4, 2005 4:19 PM
Read my post before replying Lan R E G I S T R A T I O N!

Reply #3 Friday, November 4, 2005 4:25 PM
Didn't mean to jump down your throat but it's too common for people to rant about how the BETA's don't function perfectly.
Did SDC upgrade just prior to the installation? They released a new version day before yesterday.
Reply #4 Friday, November 4, 2005 4:30 PM
| The 'upgrade' couldn't make a signature... then it decided I had used up my installs (amazing given I only upgrade when I'm prompted to and have only 3 machines - 2 of which are using last year's products). |
The Object Dock subscription is for a year. As far as I know there's no limit on downloads.
Reply #5 Friday, November 4, 2005 4:36 PM

May not help in registration issue, but SDC required the information only once & resumed the install when I pushed the Registration Info button
Reply #6 Friday, November 4, 2005 4:49 PM
Second item goes to the signature and the number of installs. I'm not familiar with any limitation on Object Desktop installs. The subscription is for a period of time and not linked to the number of times you install the program. As for the signature, I don't know what your talking about there. You do show up as a current customer, just doesn't say for which product.
I'm pretty sure your problem resulted from not uninstalling the previous version. You mention in your original thread that WB4 wasn't working after your uninstall and the install page for WB5 says you MUST uninstall the previous version first.
Reply #7 Friday, November 4, 2005 7:39 PM
You may want to read the EULA re using the software on 3 machines 
Oh, and BETA does mean you are a guinea pig - that is what you agree to when using the software. If you don't like that, stick to the released versions...
Reply #9 Friday, November 4, 2005 9:37 PM
Anyways, I'm gonna try to uninstal 4.0 and install the beta (don't know why, I must be a sucker for punichment) but in truth it's coz I wanna see a specific skin that utilises its functionality.
um, spock (Super Wizop Fuzzy Logic), given I paid for the software and these are my work machine, home machine (Desktop) and editing SupaMachine, I reckon I should be able to use my 1 subscription... dontchu?
OK, wish me luck with it... still waiting for the tech support to get back (wow are they that busy???)
Cheers for tips/comments.

Reply #10 Friday, November 4, 2005 9:49 PM
Is it me??
Reply #11 Friday, November 4, 2005 10:00 PM

Reply #12 Friday, November 4, 2005 10:22 PM
There has been problems with account errors (at Stardock) and Mike will check whether yours is ok or not. Mile will also be able to reset your activation numbers so you can attempt another install.
Also, as Lantec mentioned, make sure you manually delete all files (keep the folders) out of your WindowBinds directory, before you try and reinstall WB5. You might have to reboot your computer before you can delete all files, since WB has the tendency to hang on to them even it its unloaded.
Reply #13 Friday, November 4, 2005 10:29 PM
OK, Stardock, I gonna rant now, coz this has been drivin' me NUTZ (your fault for making such beautiful stuff)...
OK:
Installing programs should be simple, it's not. SDC is a clunky embarrassment and I have no idea why you continue to run it. Read up for just a couple of issues.
After uninstalling 5, I reinstalled 4.0... After reading this thread, I uninstalled 4.0 in the hope of reinstalling a fresh 5 (u following?) BUT, 5.0 wasn't available.
After 20 minutes trying to figure out what the hell was going on (including fiddling with 'show programmes in SDC), I decided to reboot... Low and behold, there's 5.0 again.
AT NO POINT, does the install warn u to uninstall 4.0, despite telling you that you have to reboot (the system popup is warning enough), why don't you give people instructions I've instead had to figure with my good bud Lantec here
Now don't get me wrong, I know piracy is a problem, but don't delude yourselves, I know at least two people in another forum who use OD and they got it from piratebay.
You can't stop it, best you can do is make it tricky but this SDC is not the way.
Why the hell am I asked for my act. code when you know damn well who I am from downloading and using SDC? Doesn't it have the intelligence to recognise me? No... SO DUMP THE DAMN THING!
Make a website that requires a password/username with a one-time login for payed up users so we don't have to go through this. It's an abominable program.
I'd much rather be able to go to a slick site and choose what I want and install the way other software does than use SDC.
As for WB5.0... It ROX!
Am using Dreamland (top) with Aero XP and it's soooo lush.
Make stuff easy guys, you don't have to risk security for simplicity.
OK, rant over...
Oh and another thing,
Just kidding!
Cheers Lan, much appreciated man

Reply #15 Friday, November 4, 2005 11:08 PM
Reply #16 Friday, November 4, 2005 11:24 PM
What happens is sometimes the installation packages aren't ready for prime time and the first thing your or I think is that SDC is at fault when in fact it may be a bad dll like was the case with Iconpackager during the 3.0 release. If you set it right SDC will archive you previous version and reinstall it if necessary. I can't think of too many other programs that can match up to that much functionality.
Before I ever update anything, I click the history button. The developer usually leaves some valuable information there and any installtion notes are located on the page below the program display. No, I think I'll stay with SDC. It's served me pretty well the last few years.

Reply #17 Friday, November 4, 2005 11:42 PM
I've had effectively zero problems with installing apps with SDC.....in its entire existence as a 'method' of doing so.
It's not at all 'clunky'....if you want 'clunky' talk to Symantec...
The most important word you will read in this thread is BETA.
A word from the wise....if you are concerned about potential 'issues' DO NOT run any Beta....of anything.
If your system is mission-critical then treat it as such.
If you wish to have the squeakiest-clean just-out-of-the-box trial proggies then expect issues....there will be 'some'.....it's the nature of the beast....
Reply #18 Friday, June 16, 2006 5:52 AM
Reply #19 Friday, June 16, 2006 8:48 AM
And I thought the "bring back an old thread every week" was done.
Reply #20 Friday, June 16, 2006 9:21 AM
8 months ain't bad....
Almost topical if you think astrally...
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #1 Friday, November 4, 2005 4:11 PM
That's BETA
B E T A
B E T A
And no one twisted your arm to install it.