Cheeky or Cheesey
Tuesday, September 27, 2005 by Fairyy~ | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
Not really an earth shaking matter ..but..
I just took a look at screen shot section. I know thats the least important section to most of you.Im wondering if the rules have changed or if there is a glitch in the ratings.
I Make it no secret that I dislike " cheesecake " screen shots of women in half nude poses. But it has been allowed since i've been here. Nudity doesnt bother me at all. Artistic nudes are quite pretty. Im talking about walls with women spread eagled in cutsie poses. I think there is a time and a place for everything. But..99% of the time, I just skip over those I find put women in a sexual way ...its no different if i were to make screen shots using naked men lying on a bear skin rugs. Not that I could even find such a wall. I tried..believe me......
I know that men and women are from different planets...I know that most dont care for my type of shots with fairies and dragons and flowers. And thats just fine.....
My question is.....could a moderator please check the SS section when they get a chance to see if there is a glitch or if someone is doing drive by ratings. I cant believe that there is that many shots with 1 or 2 star ratings. Seems out of place. If rules have changed and this type of shot is not acceptable..perhaps a notation from a moderator would be warranted. Some need a load of bricks dropped on them before they would actually take they low rating as a hint. I cant in all honesty rate a screen shot with cheeky women....
Thanks ..if and when someone gets a chance to look.
I just took a look at screen shot section. I know thats the least important section to most of you.Im wondering if the rules have changed or if there is a glitch in the ratings.
I Make it no secret that I dislike " cheesecake " screen shots of women in half nude poses. But it has been allowed since i've been here. Nudity doesnt bother me at all. Artistic nudes are quite pretty. Im talking about walls with women spread eagled in cutsie poses. I think there is a time and a place for everything. But..99% of the time, I just skip over those I find put women in a sexual way ...its no different if i were to make screen shots using naked men lying on a bear skin rugs. Not that I could even find such a wall. I tried..believe me......
I know that men and women are from different planets...I know that most dont care for my type of shots with fairies and dragons and flowers. And thats just fine.....
My question is.....could a moderator please check the SS section when they get a chance to see if there is a glitch or if someone is doing drive by ratings. I cant believe that there is that many shots with 1 or 2 star ratings. Seems out of place. If rules have changed and this type of shot is not acceptable..perhaps a notation from a moderator would be warranted. Some need a load of bricks dropped on them before they would actually take they low rating as a hint. I cant in all honesty rate a screen shot with cheeky women....
Thanks ..if and when someone gets a chance to look.
 |
|
Page 4 of 6 | |
|
|---|
Fairyy~
Reply #62 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:27 AM
No..you really didnt come across in a bad way at all. Jafo and I had had this conversation before about nude art. He was just reenforcing that not all nudity is bad ..he knows what I mean by cheesecake poses. I think you all know what I mean. Most men here at WC have the common sense to tell them what is appropriate nudity.
A bare womans breast with honey dripping on the " nipple "..some call it art..I call it crap.
To each their own...
Reply #62 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:27 AM
| [Night Train] Thats twice around here I have come across as the nudity police for just entering into a conversation. I don't get it. I don't care what is posted. Religous content bothers me more but I would never hold it against anyone. As the matter of fact I am glad to see some of the stuff posted here. |
No..you really didnt come across in a bad way at all. Jafo and I had had this conversation before about nude art. He was just reenforcing that not all nudity is bad ..he knows what I mean by cheesecake poses. I think you all know what I mean. Most men here at WC have the common sense to tell them what is appropriate nudity.
A bare womans breast with honey dripping on the " nipple "..some call it art..I call it crap.
To each their own...
Fairyy~
Reply #65 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:56 AM
grrrr
caught by the grammar guru.
dang
Reply #65 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:56 AM
| [Jafo] To each their own... To each his own... |
grrrr
caught by the grammar guru.
dang
Fairyy~
Reply #66 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:59 AM
Reply #66 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:59 AM
Whew..thank God I had time to correct the spelling on the word " caught"
Sleeping Dragon
Reply #67 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:40 AM
Reply #67 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:40 AM
...to each HER own? What would the gender neutral form of this be? 
Threi
Reply #68 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 11:45 AM
Reply #68 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 11:45 AM
hey its all good just as long as you people look at the screenshot and see the the woman is fully clothed (i have no idea how the topic changed to nudity...)
buzzh58
Reply #69 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 7:17 PM
Reply #69 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 7:17 PM
Remove all ratings for SS. Do that and you remove all pet jealousies, arguments and hopefully those spammers that seem to have taken over SS section, those that view it as some kind of competition where it's quantity over quality.
I'll be buggered if Id stop to comment on someones SS when they upload 4 or 5 a day and if these clowns that spam had no comments and there were no ratings to feed their over inflated egoes they'd soon tire of the pointless exercise they're engaged in and move on or at least slow down.
SS can be creative and can be useful in giving others ideas but how creative are some when they churn them out like some damn assembly line. Boring.
I'll be buggered if Id stop to comment on someones SS when they upload 4 or 5 a day and if these clowns that spam had no comments and there were no ratings to feed their over inflated egoes they'd soon tire of the pointless exercise they're engaged in and move on or at least slow down.
SS can be creative and can be useful in giving others ideas but how creative are some when they churn them out like some damn assembly line. Boring.
Threi
Reply #70 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 7:34 PM
Reply #70 Wednesday, September 28, 2005 7:34 PM
i agree that there should be a limit to the number of screenshots uploaded in a day cause spamming screenshots is just pointless...
Fairyy~
Reply #72 Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:04 AM
Reply #72 Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:04 AM
It must be a pain for moderators to even deal with so many screen shots some days. No wonder they get backed up in other sections. Granted , screen shots arent much to moderate but it still takes time to upload them to the site.
If you said 1 screen a day or week or month..I would abide by the rules. I like rules..I like order...chaos gives me hiccups
If you said 1 screen a day or week or month..I would abide by the rules. I like rules..I like order...chaos gives me hiccups
Cynder-Elluh
Reply #73 Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:29 AM
Reply #73 Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:29 AM
If men would consider not so much wherein they differ, as wherein they agree, there would be far less of uncharitableness and angry feeling. ~Joseph Addison (1672 - 1719)
buzzh58
Reply #74 Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:55 AM
I disagree
Reply #74 Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:55 AM
| If men would consider not so much wherein they differ, as wherein they agree, there would be far less of uncharitableness and angry feeling. ~Joseph Addison (1672 - 1719) |
I disagree
_02
Reply #75 Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:56 AM
Way to go, Cynder-Elluh!
Also, not that it matters much, but I agree with comments 69 on down. That is why I no longer do screenshots here.
Reply #75 Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:56 AM
| If men would consider not so much wherein they differ, as wherein they agree, there would be far less of uncharitableness and angry feeling. ~Joseph Addison (1672 - 1719) |
Way to go, Cynder-Elluh!
Also, not that it matters much, but I agree with comments 69 on down. That is why I no longer do screenshots here.
jebro
Reply #77 Thursday, September 29, 2005 7:04 AM
If everyone would agree, there would never be any interesting discussions. And certainly not any post in the threads.
Reply #77 Thursday, September 29, 2005 7:04 AM
| f men would consider not so much wherein they differ, as wherein they agree, there would be far less of uncharitableness and angry feeling. ~Joseph Addison (1672 - 1719) |
If everyone would agree, there would never be any interesting discussions. And certainly not any post in the threads.
Sleeping Dragon
Reply #79 Thursday, September 29, 2005 7:07 AM
Reply #79 Thursday, September 29, 2005 7:07 AM
I like nip... never mind. Time and place, time and place...
Cynder-Elluh
Reply #80 Thursday, September 29, 2005 7:08 AM
There will always be interesting things to discuss. Agreeing to disagree is another way to go!
Reply #80 Thursday, September 29, 2005 7:08 AM
| there would never be any interesting discussions |
There will always be interesting things to discuss. Agreeing to disagree is another way to go!
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
|
|
Page 4 of 6 | |
|
|---|
Reply #61 Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:21 PM
I'll make sure there is some on hand for that picnic in the Jungle!!