Bullsh*t
Sunday, November 3, 2002 by Jadachris2003 | Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
Reply #22 Monday, November 4, 2002 11:52 AM
i once (a long time ago) got promoted past the bandwidth cap by my scandalous waste of this sites bandwidth! all those helpful and constructive posts on the message board were sufficient

got to love the irony that by using up bandwidth i contributed, so got to use up even more bandwidth

short version for lazy readers - you can get promoted without spending any money, and even without submitting skins.
oh yes, Jadachris2003 i even subscribed even though i dint download many skins. i just love this place, and owe them for many many happy hours over the last year or two since the site opened.
Reply #23 Monday, November 4, 2002 11:57 AM
this is MY understanding of the sites policy:
when the sites resorces are running out members who have PAID to support, get priority access to the resorces.
when the site isnt overloaded, there is no need for this rule to be applied.
where else are the extra resorces supposed to come from to handle an ever increasing number of visitors?
DA uses popup adds
as part of their solution. personally, i prever WC's solution.Reply #24 Monday, November 4, 2002 11:59 AM
Reply #25 Monday, November 4, 2002 12:02 PM
Reply #27 Monday, November 4, 2002 12:04 PM
Reply #29 Monday, November 4, 2002 12:12 PM

Reply #30 Monday, November 4, 2002 12:12 PM
part of the problem is that the regulars get fed up explaining the same thing again and again and again

also, as the head of this thread demonstrates quite well, often the questions aren't exactly phrased as polite enquiries.
after all we are only human (well, apart from the occasional exception
) and we all get fed up with the rants and complaints.Reply #31 Monday, November 4, 2002 12:14 PM
Reply #33 Monday, November 4, 2002 12:19 PM
Personally I don't care about the user who has a cracked copy of WindowBlinds, and has been downloading skins for over a year and suddenly finds that his supply has been diminished. Note that I said diminished and not "cut off". People who enter into the community will always benefit, as I'm sure you are doing.
And I am not angry, I don't get angry. This is my hobby, I come here to enjoy myself. I don't make any money from any of this,(well, sometimes a little, on occasion) I just like doing what I do.
The point I want to make is this: If you are not happy with the way the site is run, you are free to join another community site that satisfies your ideals. You don't have to make skins if you are worried that you are lining other people's pockets.
Just try to enjoy it for what it is.
Reply #34 Monday, November 4, 2002 12:22 PM
Reply #35 Monday, November 4, 2002 12:35 PM

Reply #37 Monday, November 4, 2002 1:09 PM

Reply #38 Monday, November 4, 2002 2:45 PM
When the site gets too busy and the bandwidth saturated, it's normal the the ones who contribute get priority.
Reply #39 Monday, November 4, 2002 6:23 PM
You can take the ThemeXP route and just have the site be down for EVERYONE after a certain point is reached.
OR you can take the WinCustomize route of giving priority to customres and subscribers when that point is reached.
I can't understand why this isn't apparent. When the # of people on the servers reaches a certain point, SOMEONE is going to be denied access. That's just reality. That's not policy. But we have the unique ability to decide who is going to be denied access. So we give priority to people who help pay for said servers.
Those people who don't want to contribute anything can simply visit during non-peek hours.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #21 Monday, November 4, 2002 11:49 AM