A 'little' model of PzKpfw VI "Tiger"

Monday, February 27, 2012 by Jafo | Discussion: Everything Else

We've "all" seen the Tamiya models.....made them, even.....

A couple of guys took it to the 'logical' extreme......

Absolutely amazing.

http://en.fishki.net/comment.php?id=107314 

First Previous Page 2 of 4 Next Last
Uvah
Reply #21 Sunday, March 4, 2012 9:12 AM

My best was a collection planes from the Wright Bros. Kittyhawk up to Jafo's favorite, the F-105. They were 72nd. scale and at one time I had 100 of them hanging from the ceiling in my room. There were Russian, Japanese, German, Italian, British, French, American. Just about all models. Then I went on to building the big 32nd. scale. I had three favorites...ME-109...P-51...and a FA-18 Hornet. That I modified the shit out of.

CmdrNilles
Reply #22 Sunday, March 4, 2012 10:25 AM
And in the game I've been playing, I actually drive this tank. And then people like this go out and build a real one. I'm gonna go cry in a corner now
Neilo
Reply #23 Sunday, March 4, 2012 2:44 PM

My best was a collection planes from the Wright Bros. Kittyhawk up to Jafo's favorite, the F-105. They were 72nd. scale and at one time I had 100 of them hanging from the ceiling in my room.

I didn't have that many, mainly cause i focused on bombers. I had at one time an enitre wing of B-52's hanging, with no room for any else, except a lone F-4D i snuck in there. (Phantom being one of my favs)
I had three favorites...ME-109...P-51...and a FA-18 Hornet.

Loved building stangs, only slightly more than i loved building P-47's!

I still build, i have the british V bombers sitting here looking at me waiting to be painted.

CmdrNilles
I'm gonna go cry in a corner now


Uh-huh...did that the moment my fellow Aussie posted this little gem.

 

tetleytea
Reply #24 Sunday, March 4, 2012 3:43 PM

This is a fun hobby, but hardly unique.  I went to a reenactment of an Okinawa assault on a Japanese pillbox, and they had an operational Stuart tank, halftrack, and 60mm mortar.  But none of that held a candle to the flamethrower--quite literally.  Nothing was nearly as impressive as the guy spraying a can of whoop-a** on the pillbox.  Only thing missing were the screaming Japs running out of the pillbox alight--who incidentally the Japs looked strangely an awful lot like Mexicans, by the way.  

 

And right down the road from me we have a WW2 commemorative air force.  They do air shows flying a B-17, B-24, Hellcat, and a Zero.  However, if anyone builds & flies a replica of a C-7 or C-17, I'll be impressed.

Neilo
Reply #25 Sunday, March 4, 2012 3:58 PM

tetleytea
Only thing missing were the screaming Japs running out of the pillbox alight

.........

Too much. No sensitivity?

Uvah
Reply #26 Sunday, March 4, 2012 4:03 PM

P-47's were great! Originally, watch jafo correct me, they were supposed to be fighters but were better suited to ground support. Big, bulky but packed a helluva punch. Another fave, actually two....P-38 Lightning and P-61 Black Widow. I liked the P-61 more I think because there was one variant that boasted four cannons, two to a side plus a mix of machine guns in the nose. Not to mention the two turrets it had. Each with four 50 calibers.

tetleytea
Reply #27 Sunday, March 4, 2012 4:14 PM

Too much. No sensitivity?

If I offended, I apologize.  I lump it in the same category as playing WW2 computer games as the Nazis and machinegunning down the hapless Yanks.  It's all in good fun.

Neilo
Reply #28 Sunday, March 4, 2012 4:41 PM

No offense taken, just pointing out that's a topic that *could* easily offend.

P-47's were great! Originally, watch jafo correct me, they were supposed to be fighters but were better suited to ground support. Big, bulky but packed a helluva punch.

They were still exceptional fighters, bit more short range than a long range escort plane. The P-51 replaced them on long range runs, but for short to medium stuff, it excelled.
I'm not sure why though...enter Jafo..

Neilo
Reply #29 Sunday, March 4, 2012 4:53 PM

Oh, i loved the P-38, it's looks alone are enough!!!

My favortite WWII planes, in no order..

Spitfire...(a bit of a cliche to say that these days, since everyone liked 'em, but w/e)
P-51
Lanc
P-40 (close to my fav)
Bristol Beaufighter

Edit - How could i forget the F4U!!! I have two of these, one resin the other a limited edition die cast one, that remains boxed!

Sinperium
Reply #30 Sunday, March 4, 2012 5:13 PM


That'd be a Tyrrell ....and it was a flop ...

Yeah--but even though it's flawed the Nexus Six still really shows promise.

Tasunke
Reply #31 Sunday, March 4, 2012 5:17 PM

P-38s are nice.

And gotta love the Sturmoviks

Jafo
Reply #32 Sunday, March 4, 2012 5:52 PM

P-47's were great! Originally, watch jafo correct me, they were supposed to be fighters but were better suited to ground support. Big, bulky but packed a helluva punch.

Republic had a knack of building one thing but ending up with something else...both the Thunderbolt and Thunderchief in particular were BIG [really big], heavy....solid...and functional.  They were known to be able to take a lot of damage  which is why they were suited to ground support/attack.

The 'boffins' were curious about what stress the Thuds were actually put under during sorties over Vietnam so the installed specific G-force logging equipment....they were intended to handle -4 to +8 ... the usual sortof thing .... but one of them recorded 10.6 ....bugging out after an attack....

Uvah
Reply #33 Sunday, March 4, 2012 6:07 PM

Spitfire MK IV or V, I forget which one, had a four bladed prop and wing mounted cannons. There was also one that had the wing tips squared off instead of rounded. Played havoc with the FW-190's. Then came the Tempest, bigger and heavier and the Typhoon, also another heavy. One thing that always got my curiosity going the Gloster Meteor. Twin engine jet yet, though it was a contemporary it, to my knowledge never saw combat. Always wondered how it would stack up against an ME-262.

Trivia: What propeller driven plane broke the sound barrier in late WWII.

Trivia #2: What propeller driven plane went through a brick wall and sustained very little damage.

Jafo
Reply #34 Sunday, March 4, 2012 6:21 PM

Trivia: What propeller driven plane broke the sound barrier in late WWII.

None.

For the same reason there is a very finite limitation to the maximum speed of a helicopter....the first thing that approaches mach is the prop blade....and subsequently loses lift/thrust.  Mach 1 is the effective 'brick wall' for prop aircraft....

Uvah
Reply #35 Sunday, March 4, 2012 6:23 PM

Actually it was a P-47 that attained that speed in a dive and it was a P-47 that went through a brick wall.

Jafo
Reply #36 Sunday, March 4, 2012 6:50 PM

Actually it was a P-47 that attained that speed in a dive

Chuck Yeager might get a bit upset about that....

The P-47 attaining it is folk-lore and cannot be proven as the airframe is purely sub-sonic and thus would be uncontrollable trans-sonic.... in other words "IF" a pilot attempted that in a dive he is now dead.

Compression-stall on a prop prevents it getting TO mach, let alone past it....

 

Neilo
Reply #37 Sunday, March 4, 2012 7:54 PM

One thing that always got my curiosity going the Gloster Meteor. Twin engine jet yet, though it was a contemporary it, to my knowledge never saw combat. Always wondered how it would stack up against an ME-262.


Well.....Not combat in the sense you mean. they were used to screen london for the V1 and the V2 and did saw some air to ground stuff, but never air to air.

Actually it was a P-47 that attained that speed in a dive and it was a P-47 that went through a brick wall.

Compression-stall on a prop prevents it getting TO mach, let alone past it....


It's like chinese whispers , i saw a doco investigating pilots claims that on numerous occasions P-51's had possible broke the sound barrier when in step dives. As i recall they didn't disprove that those pilots had gone supersonic, but they said it would need to be a perfect storm of circumstances to achieve it, and without the airframes to study, can never be proven.

Jafo
Reply #38 Sunday, March 4, 2012 8:00 PM

One of the 'fun things' about FSX [the flight sim] is you can artificially crank up the power [speed] of an aircraft and some are so well modelled if you push mach in an airframe not intended to get there the control surfaces DO invert...ie ... nose down harder to pull out of a dive.

Quite 'spooky'...

Neilo
Reply #39 Sunday, March 4, 2012 9:24 PM

I havent used a flight sim in a while. the last one i really got into was F-15 Strike Eagke II and that was a miroprose release on the Amiga! I prefer combat flight sims, but nothing ive looked at these days suits me, i'd want FSX but combat.

Are there many mods for FSX Jafo?

Jafo
Reply #40 Sunday, March 4, 2012 9:40 PM

Are there many mods for FSX Jafo?

Er....in a word.....'squillions'.

Just about every plane ever built....and quite a few that weren't.

I have a screenie of landing Thunderbird 2 at Tulla airport somewhere.....

Extra-detailed scenery is available for just about the whole planet [and the moon...for that matter]...though I've only gone for Melbourne airport...and Essendon airport...and NY [Manhattan] - just for fun.....can't land on the Intrepid tho....not a hard-point.

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!



web-wc01