a moderation mistake?
Wednesday, February 20, 2008 by Phoon | Discussion: Stardock Software
I must ask...
How in the world did this get through moderation?
https://www.wincustomize.com/skins.aspx?skinid=35785&libid=8
Phoon
Reply #3 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:19 PM
Reply #3 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:19 PM
Wow.. 2 astonishing things just happened.
Someone saw it and acted on it very very quickly AND Zubaz made a post without slaughtering the english language!!!
thanks guys!!
Someone saw it and acted on it very very quickly AND Zubaz made a post without slaughtering the english language!!!
thanks guys!!
ZubaZ
Reply #5 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:50 PM
Reply #5 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:50 PM
Wow.. 2 astonishing things just happened.Someone saw it and acted on it very very quickly AND Zubaz made a post without slaughtering the english language!!!
These could be the end times.REPENT!!!
yrag
Reply #6 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:05 PM
Reply #6 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:05 PM
Might want to hold up on the Revival meeting........
uhhhhh...........that appears to be both English and slaughtered.
Zubaz made a post without slaughtering the english language!!!
Maybe if it we're tiled?
uhhhhh...........that appears to be both English and slaughtered.
ZubaZ
Reply #7 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:07 PM
Reply #7 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:07 PM
Someone edited my original post!! I swear it said were not we're.
Phoon
Reply #8 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:46 PM
Dang.. I was looking for obvious issues...
Let's see.. we're = we are
= Maybe if it we are tiled?
Tis Jack the Ripper, slayer of Merriam Webster for sure!
Reply #8 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:46 PM
Zubaz made a post without slaughtering the english language!!!
Maybe if it we're tiled?
Maybe if it we're tiled?
Dang.. I was looking for obvious issues...
Let's see.. we're = we are
= Maybe if it we are tiled?
Tis Jack the Ripper, slayer of Merriam Webster for sure!
Jafo
Reply #9 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:50 PM
Reply #9 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:50 PM
There IS a category in Wallpapers for 'tiles', so no, that would not have been a 'mistake'....
It was uploaded/submitted as a tile, and it is infact a tile.
Phoon
Reply #10 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:57 PM
Surely you speak from your colon! What a (pardon me in advance) gastronomic discovery.
It seemed like such an eyesore as it surely must be the one and only said "tile" in the entire gallery.
I didn't try it as a tile, but I fear that I would have to gouge out my eyes after applying it as such.
How could I possibly enjoy the foibles of Zubaz without mine eyes?
Reply #10 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 5:57 PM
There IS a category in Wallpapers for 'tiles'
Surely you speak from your colon! What a (pardon me in advance) gastronomic discovery.
It seemed like such an eyesore as it surely must be the one and only said "tile" in the entire gallery.
I didn't try it as a tile, but I fear that I would have to gouge out my eyes after applying it as such.
How could I possibly enjoy the foibles of Zubaz without mine eyes?
ZubaZ
Reply #11 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 6:03 PM
(and again, i love being able to compare member numbers on the forums.)
Reply #11 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 6:03 PM
How could I possibly enjoy the foibles of Zubaz without mine eyes?
Someday Phoon . . you'll grow too tired to run and I will have you.(and again, i love being able to compare member numbers on the forums.)
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
Reply #1 Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:54 PM