Vista's Aero UI Does Not Impact Performance?
Tastes great, less filling!
Thursday, January 4, 2007 by Zoomba | Discussion: WinCustomize News
A lot of ink has been used to talk about Aero, the new user interface built into Windows Vista. Aero represents Microsoft's most recent attempt to create a strong visual branding element to their flagship product. The glassy look, the transparency and the shiny glowy bits added to the UI look dazzling, but will all of that graphical heavy-lifting create a burden for your PC, slowing it down when trying to draw too many windows over one another?
According to Principled Technologies, a technology assessment firm, conducted a study of Windows Vista and Aero and declared that the new UI has little impact on the performance of a PC under normal operations.
They tested on a range of hardware (desktop, laptop and tablet) and the full 47-page report can be found on their website, here.
See comment #3 for some of our take on the results...
Reply #2 Thursday, January 4, 2007 11:50 AM
It's a matter of using the hardware in the system more efficiently, and letting the video card do what it does best, rather than have the rest of the subsystem take care of the rather menial task of rendering the surface.
Reply #3 Thursday, January 4, 2007 12:10 PM
The reason the study doesn't show an impact is because the people who made the test apparently don't understand what they're testing for.
What does the UI (whether it be Aero or XP) have to do with how long it takes to open up a web page or open up Adobe Photoshop?
What's next? A study that shows Aero doesn't affect the time it takes to insert a DVD into the computer?
Not a single test goes over the kinds of things that people in customization are familiar with -- speed of moving a window. Speed of resizing a window. Speed of switching between window A and window B.
I have no idea whether Aero is faster or slower than XP in those areas, but the fact they didn't test them makes the "study" worthless.
Reply #5 Thursday, January 4, 2007 3:23 PM
Reply #6 Thursday, January 4, 2007 4:36 PM
Reply #7 Thursday, January 4, 2007 6:46 PM
| In related news SQL Server 05 shows no appreciable decrease in the acceleration of my 2003 Tiburon GT. Though it does seem to make getting from 5th to 6th gear a bit more difficult. |
Best comment I've read tonight! Thanks for the chuckle!
R
Reply #8 Friday, January 5, 2007 8:21 AM
Excessive heat over a considerable amount of time is going to have an effect on the longevity of your pc's various hardware components and will ultimately degrade system performance after a while.
Plus working on a super hot laptop just isn't my cup of tea and the fans inside my desktop pc's are loud enough as is.
I would agree with Frogboy's comments that the study didn't cover all of the required bases.
An independant study (not backed my Microsoft dollars) which is more encompassing that this study would yeild more credible results for the public.
Until the time comes when I'm required to run vista, I'll continue running winxp & windowblinds as is which offers me all of my gui requirements with little if any of the performance & battery life concerns currently offered by vista.
Reply #9 Friday, January 5, 2007 8:37 AM
The study seems to be more geared towards responsiveness of the programs running on the two operating systems than attempting to compare the drawing of the shells vs. performance.
It would seem that a change occurs when the PC warms up.
I have been running the RC2 5744 for a while now, and there may be some heat increase in the system, but I suspect this is due to a combination of the greater video adapter use when running 'Aero' and the increase in process count which requires more work by the CPU.
My observation has been that the Aero shell is drawn differently (or at least appears with a fade in/fade out behaviour) than the 'Basic' shell (which seems very similar to the way XP draws the shell).
I would say that the smartest thing to do if one wants to run Vista is to make sure the PC has a minimum of 256 MB memory on the adapter, and that the PC has a dual core processor. Anything less may prove to be a disappointing experience in using the machine on a daily basis. 
Reply #10 Friday, January 5, 2007 3:47 PM
Reply #11 Saturday, January 6, 2007 7:39 AM
Reply #12 Saturday, January 6, 2007 10:43 PM
Reply #13 Saturday, January 6, 2007 10:44 PM
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
Reply #1 Thursday, January 4, 2007 11:08 AM
If there is no impact between using or not using Aero, why is it disabled if your PC is not powerful enough to run it? (If i understand correctly that it IS disabled)