WinCustomize Upgrade (Logon Issues)
Temporary login issues while we complete our upgrade
Thursday, March 16, 2006 by T-Man | Discussion: Developer Journals
We are in the procress of upgrading WinCustomize from ASP .Net v1.1 to ASP .Net v2.0. At this moment we have already updated the Personal Pages to the new version of ASP.Net.
However, ASP .Net v2.0 handles cookies differently so the login cookies are not compatible between the main site. So as you navigate from the main site to the personal pages you will find that you need to logon on and off.
We hope to complete our upgrade process tomorrow so for the next day we apologize for the inconvience with the logon system.
Reply #2 Thursday, March 16, 2006 5:17 PM

Reply #3 Thursday, March 16, 2006 5:52 PM
Reply #4 Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:48 PM

T-Man, When someone gets a chance..maybe this could be looked into. pleeeeease. http://nighttrain2002.wincustomize.com/Articles.aspx?SID=4239&AID=97628
Reply #6 Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:15 PM
Reply #7 Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:54 PM
Reply #8 Friday, March 17, 2006 9:42 AM
| When I sign on and then go to my skins it just keeps going back to before I was signed on..Like I never signed on.... |
Me too. I had to sign on about 5 times before I was totally in.

Reply #9 Friday, March 17, 2006 12:26 PM

Reply #10 Friday, March 17, 2006 3:07 PM

Reply #12 Friday, March 17, 2006 5:42 PM
Reply #13 Friday, March 17, 2006 5:52 PM
Down time...& Then
Back UP If You Decide To Go V2.o I Say Ok Time Is Now Do It Although Has Been Fine.All You Customizers Need To Stick With CuztomizeinWin Wincustomize Belongs To US! They Made Us Happy We MAde Them Rich IT All Works Right?!

Reply #14 Sunday, March 19, 2006 1:28 AM
Reply #15 Sunday, March 19, 2006 1:35 AM
I must have missed something while away for a while, but I no longer have a "Insert Image" button available in the comment section.
In fact, it looks like I have been demoted to normal subscriber, with no moderator buttons in any comment sections.
Reply #16 Sunday, March 19, 2006 4:28 AM

Reply #18 Wednesday, March 22, 2006 3:16 PM
| I tried installing v2.0 .NET last year on my comp and what i found was v1.1 was still in the add/remove and after deleting v1.1 and then going to m/s update to check for more upates it said i needed 1.1 .NET when i already had v2.0 installed, |
The 1.1 and 2.0 versions of the .NET framework are mutually exclusive. In other words the presence of one does not preclude the need for the other. Apps written for pre 2.0 versions of the framework will not work with just 2.0 installed and obviously apps written for 2.0 will not work with 1.x installed.
| Whats new in 2.0? |
There are actually some really kewl technologies in the 2.0 framework such as partial classes and Generics. It should be fairly kewl once the little upgrade issues are worked out. Too bad I left the job I had writing C# apps
. Oh well, I live in a much nicer place now so it was all worth it. 
Reply #19 Thursday, March 23, 2006 5:06 AM
Reply #20 Friday, March 24, 2006 12:53 PM
| Hey Kevin ,cheers for that |
Not a problem, glad it was helpful.. I just wish MS had thought about these sorts of things when they released 2.0. I'm sure there are lots of people out there wondering why they can't run a 1.1 compatible application on a box with the 2.0 framework installed. It definitely kills the idea of backward compatibility. Then again everything MS is doing with .NET is meant to avoid the DLL nightmares that one could encounter with older technologies.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #1 Thursday, March 16, 2006 4:59 PM