Mocking of Tsunami Tragedy
Friday, January 28, 2005 by AtlanticCanadianScot | Discussion: Websites
Community Reaction: http://www.newsday.com/entertainment/ny-ethot0129,0,8025.story?coll=ny-homepage-promo I want as many people as possible aware of this sad incidence of arrogant disregard for human suffering & disrespect of other nationalities
Reply #2 Friday, January 28, 2005 12:04 PM
| Sure, the US Constitution protects free speech, but it does not protect hate speech. |
I hope you never become a Supreme Court Justice.
Reply #3 Friday, January 28, 2005 12:27 PM
Fond Regards From Atlantic Canada
Reply #4 Friday, January 28, 2005 12:40 PM
It doesn't make these people any less contemptable.
Reply #5 Friday, January 28, 2005 2:08 PM
I'll be the first to admit you shouldn't take legal advice from me. The topic just had me a bit hot under the coller. If there's one thing I won't tolerate, it's intolerance. 
I'm not completely off the mark though. There are many types of speech that are not protected by the Constitution. The courts have been debating it for decades. Feel free to read up on it if you're interested. http://supreme.lp.findlaw.com/constitution/amendment01/18.html#f106
Reply #6 Friday, January 28, 2005 2:42 PM

Reply #7 Friday, January 28, 2005 2:51 PM
The clip I read was, indeed, offensive. But I will not be a part of any petition, online or otherwise. I have written many pieces myself deemed "offensive"; all of them have been submitted with thought and were stated as they were to express a point.
But the larger point remains. How would anyone expect a radio station that specializes in the most offensive genre of music ever produced (try LISTENING to eminem and 50 cent; though I will defend their rights as artists, they get pretty offensive in their music) expect them to "tone it down" when it comes to a subject such as this?
Put simply, I don't consider it harmless humor, but I don't think it's the same thing as dragging a black man to death in Jasper, Texas. If you don't like it, alerting others to this station's brand of *humor* and personally boycotting the station may be enough
(on the other hand, are you aware of how many folks may be drawn to the station not from the original song but from your drawing attention to it? Sometimes, the best response is silence).
Reply #8 Friday, January 28, 2005 2:57 PM
Reply #9 Friday, January 28, 2005 3:09 PM
Reply #10 Friday, January 28, 2005 3:22 PM
Reply #11 Friday, January 28, 2005 4:11 PM
Reply #12 Friday, January 28, 2005 10:17 PM

Reply #13 Friday, January 28, 2005 11:04 PM
Reply #14 Friday, January 28, 2005 11:20 PM
Reply #15 Friday, January 28, 2005 11:33 PM
| Sure, the US Constitution protects free speech, but it does not protect hate speech. |
I disagree. Free Speech means exactly that: We can say whatever we like in the US. But in this case some things should not have been said.
The minute the US Govenrment says we can't say anything we want to is the day the Consituition is just scrap paper.
Reply #16 Friday, January 28, 2005 11:45 PM
Thx for your contribution.....I remember that situation in Quebec this fall very well, & yes, there was the typical agonizings about free speech, but in the wash, it was concluded that it wasn't really "free speech" as in a valid & balanced debate of ideas & ideals, but rather, a piss & vinegar rot of "Hate Propaganda", which in the letter of the law is not deemed in the best interest of the community, which is what common law is based on
Reply #17 Friday, January 28, 2005 11:53 PM
Your point is absolutely valid....it is a fine line between censorship & regulation, BUT in this case the collective value system of the community was offended, SO, it would seem your FCC should step in & evaluate a broadcaster that offends the community standard for decency, much like our Canadian Regulatory Television Commission did with a recent case in one of our provinces....we Canadians are as outspoken as our fellow Americans, & value that civil liberty as much as yourselves....BUT when that civil liberty is exercised at the expense of the greater good, the Feds do intervene & the public is pleased...democracy in action....the will of the majority. Thx for taking the time to consider this sad reality check in NY & contributing
Reply #18 Saturday, January 29, 2005 8:06 AM

Reply #19 Saturday, January 29, 2005 1:18 PM
Reply #20 Saturday, January 29, 2005 5:19 PM
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!







Reply #1 Friday, January 28, 2005 11:53 AM
I read about this on CNN and I was truly disgusted. It was the kind of thing that engraged me to the point that I wanted to go down to New York and crack some skulls myself. From what I read, I got the impression that this morning show has a history of racism and bigotry. It's incredibly shameful. Sure, the US Constitution protects free speech, but it does not protect hate speech. Those involved should be punished to the fullest extent of the law and not a single one of them should be given the opportunity to perpetuate intolerance on our airwaves again. As far as I'm concerned, their broadcasting careers should end here. Their disregard for human life is inexcusable.