I don't want WB moving my skins!!!

Thursday, September 20, 2007 by RGadelha | Discussion:

After updating WB yesterday (9/20) it started moving my skins to a folder all users could find them. I don't want this for sure! It means it is moving almost 2GB to my C: and I don't have much space in there. I want my skins in D:, like it was before, where I have a lot of space. My C: is just for Windows files and that's all. I don't even use Program Files to install programs unless I don't have the option to change that. But for my skins, YES, I want to have the option to put them where I want them.

So I uninstalled WB and am waiting for a fix for this, please?

Thank you for your attention - Roberto Gadelha

First Previous Page 2 of 6 Next Last
Old_Crab
Reply #21 Friday, September 21, 2007 4:17 AM
NO. No. No. No. No Way. My skins are private. No one is to use them unless asked. I share my computer with too many people to have eveybody sharing my skins. Or as I have just discovered deleting and changing others. This violates my privacy. I've made a decision to go back and uninstall WB6 to the previous version. This is not the way ANY program should behave. I did agree to the moving of my skins though and I thought that they were being just moved to another folder in the Stardock folder and not across the drive to a public shared folder. To move all my personal data files out to a shared folder .... I'm mad. I've been a WC user for awhile now and never have I been so angry with Stardock for this that....I've thought....to cancel my subscription....I'm angry. And I've also just noticed that all the SoundPackager files are now stored in My Documents folder. What gives? I want all my Stardock stuff in my Program Files folder. My Documents folder is stuffed to bursting! I can't find my anything in there anymore because of all the junk placed in there. Music, Videos, Wallpaper, now sound and Windowblind skins!
Neil Banfield
Reply #22 Friday, September 21, 2007 5:29 AM

WindowBlinds has a requirement that all skins are stored in a location that can at least be read by every user on the machine.

Microsoft believe than an app consists of executable files and data files and that user data files should not be stored off \program files.

These two requirements mean there are only 2 suitable locations for the WB skins.  Common documents (which is where they are now) and common application data.  App data is hidden away and is very difficult for a user to get to so common documents (also known as shared documents or public documents - Microsoft keeps on changing the name) was considered to be the most suitable location.

Old Crab: Even with WB 5 your skins could be edited or deleted by any other user on the system (or applied as all they need to do is run wbconfig)

WebGizmos
Reply #23 Friday, September 21, 2007 7:04 AM
I can see XP users are going to be affected by Vista now whether we have it or not. But at least we can...or at least I hope we can define through the registry where the skins are going to be for XP users. I saw someone in another thread though saying it wasn't working for them...I really hope this isn't the case.

While I understand the crap you guys have to go through with Microsoft...I don't think XP users should have to be subjected to the problems Vista users have to go through now. Just my 2 cents.
thomassen
Reply #24 Friday, September 21, 2007 7:19 AM
Just curious ... if the WB skins were to be moved, why not in the Stardock folder under My Documents same as the ObjectDock Library and Soundpackager folders.

It would be nice to have a little consistency ... having one program put its files here and another putting its files there helter skelter makes it a bit of a pain to keep track of for backups, etc.

No. Please no.
I really do not like it when programs puts its files in My Documents. They way I see it it's meant to be, for just that; documents. I don't want a bunch of application settings and other stuff there.

Unfortunately many applications do this, so I'm forced to use a completely separate folder to store my documents so I can organize the folder to my liking.
thomassen
Reply #25 Friday, September 21, 2007 7:29 AM
Microsoft believe than an app consists of executable files and data files and that user data files should not be stored off \program files.

I can see the point. But then you got people like me that doesn't install apps to Program Files, except for those that doesn't even ask you where to install itself.
I create my own hierarchy of folder structure to where I install my programs and keep my data files.
Would it be possible to have an advanced button, on the message box which informs you about the move, which will allow you to choose where to install it?
It's good that there is the registry setting to manually set where to store it. So power users can edit it them self. But it's not something people would simply know about without some digging.

Like RGadelha I don't have much space on the OS partition of some of my computers. This is because I dualboot and keep most things on a shared partition leaving the OS partition rather small.
Jafo
Reply #26 Friday, September 21, 2007 9:49 AM

My Office/work/doc files have always been located OFF the 'C' drive...away from a 'wobbly' OS....so what goes into 'my documents' matters diddly.

As for protecting 'keepables' such as WB skins, WA skins, Docs, etc....all are separately backed by schedule to a third drive.

Nothing is left to chance.

And Keepsafe handles the Doc's as they alter when open.

Putting skins into 'my docs'....if it's the place MS 'wants' such to go...then that's that.  I'll simply work around/along with it....backing them from potential dramas as always...

RGadelha
Reply #27 Saturday, September 22, 2007 5:09 PM
...Microsoft believe than an app consists of executable files and data files and that user data files should not be stored off \program files.

These two requirements mean there are only 2 suitable locations for the WB skins...


Well, again, what about an option for us XP users to choose the place of our skins? Won't you please? Is there a risk of The Big Brother (MS) not giving the "Windows Vista Ready Seal" to Stardock?   

elvee
Reply #28 Saturday, September 22, 2007 5:45 PM
Ah Change...Loved and hated at the same time. At the moment I am not too thrilled about it, but I understand the reasoning behind the file movement. I will just have to adapt.   
Old_Crab
Reply #29 Monday, September 24, 2007 2:04 AM
Adapt? Never I say! Revolt! Start a rebellion of the oppressed masses! Stage a riot! Stop drinking coffee from Starbucks and buying programs from Microsoft. Force them to listen to the public that shells out the money for their Rolls Royces and McMansions! ............*sigh*.....Tantrum finished.
aufisch
Reply #30 Monday, September 24, 2007 2:40 AM
I really do not like it when programs puts its files in My Documents. They way I see it it's meant to be, for just that; documents. I don't want a bunch of application settings and other stuff there.

Unfortunately many applications do this, so I'm forced to use a completely separate folder to store my documents so I can organize the folder to my liking.


I wholeheartedly (is that even a word?) agree with that.

I can't find my documents anymore in the "My Documents"-folder!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I soooooo hate/loathe/detest it when programs put their backload in there.

Especially if their uninstaller "forgets" to remove those folders, either by design or by error. This means we now have at least three places which we have to clean out manually if we want to uninstall a program for good.

Poddytat
Reply #31 Monday, September 24, 2007 7:07 PM
At least y'all are getting your WB updated, SD Central has been telling me for an hour now it's updating but nada yet.
MySecret
Reply #32 Monday, September 24, 2007 8:02 PM
Poddytat, if you have auto archive turned on in SDC, turn it off & try again, see if that works. Stardock staff have reported that as a possible fix and has worked for others.

It's My Secret
RGadelha
Reply #33 Monday, September 24, 2007 11:12 PM
I've updated right now to v5.92b.093 but I've seen no sign of a fix for what I'm asking for. Sad, just sad!
Well, we are just the patron here, doesn't we?

Neil Banfield
Reply #34 Tuesday, September 25, 2007 9:49 AM

Asking the user would require a change to how SDC works.

Once your skins have been migrated you are free to change those registy keys to point to any folder.  Though it is very important that all users have read & write permissions on that folder.

Bebi Bulma
Reply #35 Tuesday, September 25, 2007 8:25 PM
Once your skins have been migrated you are free to change those registy keys to point to any folder. Though it is very important that all users have read & write permissions on that folder.


Yeah but what about people who are wary (and rightfully so) about messing with the registry? I know I'm not comfortable with it.
ZubaZ
Reply #36 Tuesday, September 25, 2007 9:06 PM
Yeah but what about people who are wary (and rightfully so) about messing with the registry? I know I'm not comfortable with it.
How about a extra download from SDC (like the extra skins you can download) that is a form where you can browse to where you want the skins and on submit it edits the right keys in the registry to the desired path?
RGadelha
Reply #37 Tuesday, September 25, 2007 11:21 PM
Asking the user would require a change to how SDC works.

Once your skins have been migrated you are free to change those registy keys to point to any folder. Though it is very important that all users have read write permissions on that folder.


Dear Mr. Banfield,
And it's a pleasure I'm quoting you, because I know who you are, but that's my point:
I'm all sat here. I've done all the registry changes and it's working pretty good for me right now. I could give up here but the problem is I'm an old programmer, since 1977 I'm dealing with comps, I've got my first PC (it wasn't called a PC yet) in 1979. In 1982... well, I've could told you a longer and boring history, but not!

I'm gonna repeat myself: please, just create an option, for us XP users, to choose where our skins will be, or to let us not to move them. Whatever, it was a great pleasure to talk to you, or to quote you anyway...

Fuzzy Logic
Reply #38 Wednesday, September 26, 2007 4:29 AM

My main gripe is that I've now got Stardock stuff spread all over my pc. WB skins are in one place, dreams in another, and OD icons, I've at least three different locations for those.

Some consistency throughout all these programs would be welcome. One single location for all skins etc.

eieio
Reply #39 Wednesday, September 26, 2007 7:48 AM
Some consistency throughout all these programs would be welcome. One single location for all skins etc.


My thoughts exactly.

Since it looks like WB skins are in their present location to stay, we just need to get the developers of Objectdock, Soundpackager, and apparently Dreams (still on XP here, so I'll defer to Fuzzy on this one) to move their stuff to the same place as WB skins.
ZubaZ
Reply #40 Wednesday, September 26, 2007 7:52 AM
My main gripe is that I've now got Stardock stuff spread all over my pc.
Don't get me started on my Start | All Programs | Stardock/ObjectDesktop/Wincustomize/Total Gaming/Stardock Games    

Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

  • Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
  • Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
  • Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
  • It's simple, and FREE!



web-wc01