New FX--Bug with CursorXP
Configuration Window
Saturday, February 11, 2006 by Majic7 | Discussion: WindowFX
When I have the new version of Windows FX loaded and bring up the configuration window for Cursor XP this is what happens to it.
aimzzz
Reply #3 Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:30 AM
Reply #3 Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:30 AM
Working as expected here-- I have per-pixel alpha accelleration... 
ZubaZ
Reply #4 Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:43 AM
-=sigh=-
Reply #4 Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:43 AM
| Working as expected here-- I have per-pixel alpha accelleration... |
-=sigh=-
Majic7
Reply #6 Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:20 PM
Reply #6 Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:20 PM
What kind of card do you have aimzzz? Mine supports per-pixel alpha blending and constant alpha blending acceleration according to the performance advice and WindowFX is fully supported by the drivers.
aimzzz
Reply #7 Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:35 PM
Reply #7 Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:35 PM
I have an ATI 9600 SE with the latest Catalyst drivers-- a recent gift from someone who couldn't use it (lucky me!) 
I just changed the WB to Dreamland, which has a good bit of window border translucency, & still see no problem with the CursorXP config dialog. Also no problem with the Startup & Systray checkboxes discussed in another thread...
I just changed the WB to Dreamland, which has a good bit of window border translucency, & still see no problem with the CursorXP config dialog. Also no problem with the Startup & Systray checkboxes discussed in another thread...
Majic7
Reply #8 Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:44 PM
Reply #8 Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:44 PM
I have a NVidia GeForce 5500. I changed from ATI because supposedly NVidia supports Open GL better and I have a couple of programs that use it. Can't have one that does everything I guess.
aimzzz
Reply #9 Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:52 PM
Reply #9 Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:52 PM
From #7
I was lucky. If I had researched to buy a card, I'm not sure what I would have gotten, but I couldn't afford one now. So far, it's been a wonderful gift. My 6-year-old ATI couldn't do anything like this...
I was lucky. If I had researched to buy a card, I'm not sure what I would have gotten, but I couldn't afford one now. So far, it's been a wonderful gift. My 6-year-old ATI couldn't do anything like this...
Bichur
Reply #10 Saturday, February 11, 2006 2:04 PM
Reply #10 Saturday, February 11, 2006 2:04 PM
Animations - I do not want windows to animate.
With animation on, I get Magic7's pic.
With animation off, I get Aimzzz' pic.
With animation on, I get Magic7's pic.
With animation off, I get Aimzzz' pic.
Bichur
Reply #13 Saturday, February 11, 2006 3:23 PM
Reply #13 Saturday, February 11, 2006 3:23 PM
Newer than:
WFX 2.89[b].003
WB 5.00b[b].002
both dated 2/10/2006
?
Cuz, that's all I'm seeing.
WFX 2.89[b].003
WB 5.00b[b].002
both dated 2/10/2006
?
Cuz, that's all I'm seeing.
aimzzz
Reply #14 Saturday, February 11, 2006 3:48 PM
Reply #14 Saturday, February 11, 2006 3:48 PM
Well my bad-- I checked late yesterday afternoon & nothing new was showing. This afternoon they were there. I didn't look at the date-- just clicked install. Thought they were new today... 
Did you install them yesterday?
A little self-flagellation may be in order here...
Did you install them yesterday?
A little self-flagellation may be in order here...
Bichur
Reply #15 Saturday, February 11, 2006 4:33 PM
Reply #15 Saturday, February 11, 2006 4:33 PM
I updated just prior to my posting...wanted to see if I got the same effects. Saw Stoneblue's post about WFX being updated.
I'm using NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 with AGP8X
driver version is 6.14.10.4523(45.23)
hmmmm...probably should update...but have seen too many posts about other probs with updated drivers & an update would be about 20mb on dialup
self-flagellation for who
I'm using NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 with AGP8X
driver version is 6.14.10.4523(45.23)
hmmmm...probably should update...but have seen too many posts about other probs with updated drivers & an update would be about 20mb on dialup
self-flagellation for who
aimzzz
Reply #16 Saturday, February 11, 2006 5:15 PM
Reply #16 Saturday, February 11, 2006 5:15 PM
I was thinking for myself, for my mistake, but you would do just fine 
PurrBall
Reply #18 Saturday, February 11, 2006 8:07 PM
Reply #18 Saturday, February 11, 2006 8:07 PM
The window borders show fine but the window is too small
Majic7
Reply #19 Saturday, February 11, 2006 9:35 PM
Reply #19 Saturday, February 11, 2006 9:35 PM
I turned off the window animations and that does clear up the problem. Now if someone has figured out System Settings that would be cool. More updates please. Updates are almost as good as a great looking skin. I was getting all twitchy waiting for Neal and the gang to get caught up. Nice to have WindowFX back.
Please login to comment and/or vote for this skin.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums and downloading skins.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!
Reply #1 Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:13 AM
NCTARHEEL